ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01939
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His SF Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated
24 November 1987, be amended to reflect the following:
A. Item 21, Mouth and Throat Abnormal rather than Normal.
Add the following notes regarding Item 21:
21a. 16 and 17 missing extracted February 1972.
21b. 1-15 - extracted replaced by dentures September
1982.
B. Item 44, Dental missing teeth: bottom 17, 31 and 32.
Add the following note regarding Item 44:
Replaced by Dentures 1-16.
2. His SF Form 93, Report of Medical History, dated 24 November
1987, be amended in Item 25, Physicians summary, and elaboration
of all pertinent data to reflect the following notes:
Dental - Abnormal rather than Normal.
Missing teeth 17, 31 and 32 extracted.
Replaced by Dentures 1-16.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 March 2011, the Board considered and partially approved the
applicants appeal. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.
In an application to the Board dated 7 November 2011, the
applicant requests reconsideration. He states his original
request was partially approved because of the absence of active
duty dental records. He has provided dental records to
substantiate his claim.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFMOA/SGDD recommends partial approval. They state that based on
review of the dental records provided the following entries
should be amended and notes added to the SF Form 88 and SF Form
93 dated 24 November 1987:
a. SF Form 88, Clinical Evaluation: Item #21: No changes
from a dental perspective; this item is part of the medical
providers evaluation and not the dental provider. If the
applicant is seeking a change, the medical record should be
reviewed.
b. SF Form 88, Dental Section, Item #44: Please chart all
maxillary teeth as missing and replaced by complete maxillary
denture, add note - maxillary denture completed September 1982.
Also chart on mandibular arch missing teeth 17, 31, and 32.
c. SF Form 93, Item 25, add note all maxillary teeth missing
1-16, replaced by complete denture. Missing mandibular teeth 17,
31, and 32.
The SGDD complete evaluation is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 February 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit I). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFMOA/SGH recommends partial approval. They state that based on
review of the medical and dental documentation provided the
following entries should be amended and notes added to the
SF88 and SF93 dated 24 November 1987:
a. SF Form 88, Clinical Evaluation: Item #21: No change
recommended. Edentulous areas (missing teeth) brought about by
dental extractions are not considered abnormal findings.
b. SF Form 88, Dental Section, Item #44: Please chart all
maxillary teeth as missing and replaced by complete maxillary
denture, add Note: Maxillary denture completed September 1982.
Also chart on mandibular arch missing teeth 17, 31, and 32.
c. SF Form 93, Item 25, add note all maxillary teeth missing
1-16, replaced by complete denture. Missing mandibular teeth 17,
31, and 32.
The SGH complete evaluation is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 20 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit K). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
partial relief. We note that based on the medical and dental
documentation provided by the applicant AFMOA/SGDD and AFMOA/SGH
recommend approval of his requests with the exception of item #21
of the SF Form 88, as edentulous areas brought about by dental
extractions and are not considered abnormal findings. We agree
with their assessment and recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination,
dated 24 November 1987, be amended in Item 44, Dental, to
include, Chart all maxillary teeth as missing and replaced by
complete maxillary denture. Chart on mandibular arch missing
teeth 17, 31 and 32. Maxillary denture completed September 1982.
b. The Standard Form 93, Report of Medical History, dated
24 November 1987, be amended in Item 25, Physicians summary and
elaboration of all pertinent data, to include: All maxillary
teeth missing 1-16, replaced by complete denture. Missing
mandibular teeth 17, 31 and 32.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01939 in Executive Session on 30 May 2013, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-01939 was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 25 March 2011,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 7 November 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFMOA/SGDD, dated 20 January 2012.
Exhibit I. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 February 2012.
Exhibit J. Letter, AFMOA/SGH, dated 15 February 2013.
Exhibit K. Email, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 March 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01939
Defective distant vision acuity diagnosis 13 June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 1. His Standard Form 93, Report of Medical History, dated 24 November 1987, be amended in Item 25, Physicians summary and elaboration of all pertinent data to reflect the following notes: Defective distant vision acuity diagnosis...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01279
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01279 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His SF 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated 16 Aug 68, be removed from his records. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGH recommends removal of page two of the applicants SF 88, dated 16 Aug 68. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03985
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03985 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Standard Form (SF) 88, Report of Medical Examination, and SF 93, Report of Medical History, both dated 2 Oct 73, be removed from his records. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The SF 88 and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00993
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he was suffering from major depression. There is no reference of depression in the applicants medical records during his Air Force military service from 1971-1974. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Oct 14.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018860
The applicant requests, in effect: a. correction of his military records to show he was retained on active duty for medical/dental treatment in 2004 and b. provision of artificial teeth (dentures) to replace the 13 teeth extracted while he was in a military duty status in 2004. The applicant's available records do not contain active duty or mobilization orders. The available evidence is insufficient to show he served on active duty or was released from active duty in 2003/2004.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05220
A complete copy of the applicants response is at Exhibit E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicants request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C. Exhibit B.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01891
Separation Date: 20050826 The MEB also identified and forwarded posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic, as medically acceptable.The Informal PEB adjudicated the right mandibular defect as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). There was clear documentation in the service treatment record that the CI had a right mandibular body (not mandibular ramus) defect and the oralsurgeon MEB addendum reported that the panorex...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015299
He was eligible for the $50,000.00 TSGLI benefit for the right arm amputation; however, he received the higher amount of $75,000.00 for the loss of ADL (bathing, dressing, and eating) and other traumatic injury (OTI) for 90 consecutive days of hospitalization. He claimed he suffered a qualifying loss for: * a second-degree burn to the body including the face and head * facial reconstruction of his lower jaw of 50 percent of the left mandibular on 15 October 2005; the form was certified by...
The Medical Practice Review Board (MPRB) ignored the opinion of the legal reviewer, who indicated there was a violation of due process. In light of this, neither the applicant’s credentials records nor any other Air Force, DOD, State or professional reporting records should be expunged of the evidence of the applicant’s record of substandard performance and dental practice. Under AFI 44-119 and DOD Instruction 6025.15, the Air Force reports adverse privileging actions to the NPDB for...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00153
The TMD and trigeminal neuralgia conditions were intertwined problems and the Board first considered whether the TMD condition was a separately unfitting condition. Service Treatment Record I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.